Comparison Guide

Gong vs Chorus: Which Sales Training Platform Actually Works

Last updated: November 3, 2025 10 min read

Both record calls and promise to make your team better. Both are expensive. Here's which one delivers on the promise and when you should skip both.

The Short Answer

For most teams: Get Gong if you can afford it. Better AI, better insights, better deal intelligence. It's the gold standard for a reason.

If Gong is too expensive: Get Chorus. You'll get 80% of the value at 70% of the cost. Especially good if you're already on ZoomInfo.

If you're under 20 reps: Skip both. Neither is worth the cost until you have dedicated sales enablement focus and budget. Use Zoom recording + manual review instead.

The Reality Check You Need First

Before we compare features, let's be honest about conversation intelligence platforms:

  • They're expensive. $1,200-2,000+ per user per year. For a 30-person team, that's $36,000-60,000+ annually.
  • They require dedicated time. If managers won't spend 3-5 hours per week reviewing calls and coaching, it's wasted money.
  • They surface problems you already know about. "Reps talk too much" isn't news. You need to act on the insights.
  • ROI is hard to measure. Did deals close because of the platform or despite it?

Still want one? Good. Here's the comparison.

What I Tested

I've used both platforms at different companies over 4+ years. One company had Gong with 45 reps. Another had Chorus with 30 reps. I'm not running them side-by-side, but I know how they work in real sales organizations.

Gong

What It Is: The category leader in conversation intelligence. Records calls, transcribes everything, uses AI to surface deal risks, track competitor mentions, analyze what top performers do differently. Built for revenue teams that take coaching seriously.

Best Features:

  • Deal intelligence: Flags risks before you lose deals (multi-threading gaps, lack of executive engagement)
  • Competitor tracking: Automatically catches competitor mentions and objections
  • AI insights: Best-in-class AI that actually finds useful patterns
  • Market intelligence: Aggregate trends across all calls (what's working, what's not)

Biggest Weaknesses:

  • Price: Most expensive option. No published pricing (red flag).
  • Complexity: Lots of features. Takes time to learn and use effectively.
  • Overwhelming: So much data you can get lost in it

Real Pricing: $1,200-2,000+ per user per year depending on team size and negotiation. Expect $1,600/user/year average.

Best For: Enterprise sales teams (50+ reps), companies with dedicated enablement managers, complex B2B sales, well-funded companies where budget isn't the primary concern.

Chorus.ai (by ZoomInfo)

What It Is: Conversation intelligence platform now owned by ZoomInfo. Records calls, provides AI-powered insights, tracks deals. Very similar to Gong but generally 20-30% cheaper and slightly less feature-rich.

Best Features:

  • ZoomInfo integration: Native connection if you're already using ZoomInfo for data
  • Deal tracking: Solid deal intelligence and risk identification
  • Call analytics: Good insights on talk ratios, monologues, engagement
  • Price advantage: Noticeably cheaper than Gong

Biggest Weaknesses:

  • AI is good, not great: Gong's AI is noticeably better at pattern recognition
  • Fewer advanced features: Missing some of Gong's enterprise capabilities
  • ZoomInfo dependency: Gets less compelling if you're not on ZoomInfo

Real Pricing: $900-1,500 per user per year depending on team size. Generally 20-30% cheaper than Gong.

Best For: Mid-market teams (20-100 reps), companies already using ZoomInfo, teams that can't justify Gong's premium pricing, companies wanting conversation intelligence without enterprise cost.

Feature Comparison: What Actually Matters

Core Functionality

Feature Gong Chorus
Call Recording Excellent Excellent
Transcription Quality 95%+ accurate 90%+ accurate
AI Quality Best in class Very good
Deal Intelligence Advanced Good
Coaching Features Extensive Good
Market Intelligence Excellent Basic

Integration & Technical

Integration Gong Chorus
Salesforce Native, deep Native, deep
HubSpot Native Native
Zoom Yes Yes
Microsoft Teams Yes Yes
Google Meet Yes Yes
ZoomInfo Via API Native (owned by ZoomInfo)
Outreach/SalesLoft Yes Yes

Specific Feature Breakdown

Deal Intelligence

Gong wins. Gong's deal intelligence is more sophisticated. It catches subtle risks like:

  • Single-threaded deals (only talking to one person)
  • Lack of next steps
  • Champion absence on calls
  • Budget conversation gaps

Chorus has deal tracking but it's less nuanced. You'll get basics but not the advanced pattern recognition.

Coaching & Development

Tie. Both are good here. You can:

  • Create playlists of great calls
  • Leave timestamped comments
  • Track coaching completion
  • See improvement over time

Gong has more features, but Chorus has enough for effective coaching.

Competitor Intelligence

Gong wins. Automatically tracks competitor mentions and groups objections. You can see exactly what prospects say about competitors and how top reps respond. Chorus has this too, but Gong's is better organized.

Market Intelligence

Gong wins big. Gong's market intelligence aggregates trends across all calls:

  • What messaging is working this quarter
  • Which industries are mentioning budget concerns
  • How talk-time ratios correlate with win rates

Chorus has basic analytics but nothing like Gong's market-level insights.

User Interface

Gong wins slightly. Both are well-designed. Gong feels more polished. Chorus is good but slightly clunkier. Not a deal-breaker either way.

Pricing Reality

For a 30-person sales team:

  • Gong: ~$48,000/year ($1,600/user/year estimated)
  • Chorus: ~$36,000/year ($1,200/user/year estimated)
  • Difference: $12,000/year

Is Gong worth the extra $12k/year?

Depends on your situation:

  • If you have dedicated enablement team: Yes. You'll use the advanced features.
  • If managers are barely reviewing calls now: No. Save the money.
  • If you're doing enterprise deals ($100k+ ACV): Yes. Deal intelligence alone can save one deal.
  • If you're doing transactional sales: No. Less valuable for short sales cycles.

When to Choose Each

Choose Gong If:

  • You have 50+ reps and dedicated enablement team
  • You're doing complex, consultative B2B sales
  • Deal sizes are $50k+ (one saved deal justifies the cost)
  • You want best-in-class AI and insights
  • Budget isn't your primary constraint
  • You're serious about data-driven coaching

Bottom line: Best tool in category. Worth the premium if you'll actually use it properly.

Choose Chorus If:

  • You're a mid-market team (20-100 reps)
  • You're already using ZoomInfo (integration is native)
  • You want conversation intelligence but can't justify Gong's price
  • You need "good enough" not "best in class"
  • You're comparing to much cheaper tools (Chorus wins)

Bottom line: Solid choice that gets you 80% there at 70% of the cost.

Skip Both If:

  • You have fewer than 20 reps
  • Managers aren't currently reviewing calls
  • Your sales cycle is under 2 weeks
  • Budget is very tight
  • You're not ready to invest in formal coaching

Alternative: Use Zoom's recording feature and manually review calls. It's free and forces you to build the coaching muscle before spending $50k/year.

What About MindTickle, Lessonly, etc.?

Different category. Those are learning management systems with some call recording. Gong and Chorus are conversation intelligence first. If you need structured training programs, look at MindTickle. If you need call intelligence, it's Gong vs Chorus.

→ See all training platform reviews

My Recommendation

If you're serious about conversation intelligence and can afford it: Get Gong. It's better. The AI is better. The insights are better. If you're going to spend $1,200/user/year, spend $1,600/user/year and get the best.

If Gong is too expensive but you still want this: Get Chorus. You'll be happy with it. It does 80% of what Gong does, and for many teams, that's enough.

If you're not sure: Start with call recording and manual review for 3 months. If managers actually review calls consistently, then invest in a platform. If they don't, saved yourself $50k.

The Uncomfortable Truth

Most teams buy these platforms and don't use them properly. Managers review calls for the first month, then it fades. The platform becomes a very expensive call recording tool.

Before you buy either:

  1. Get commitment from managers to review 5 calls per week minimum
  2. Assign someone to own coaching (doesn't happen by itself)
  3. Define what success looks like (not just "better calls")
  4. Plan specific coaching workflows (when, how, who)

If you can't commit to that, save your money.